...MOVIE REVIEWS..............PODCAST..............TRAILERS..............NEWS..............FEATURES..............TELEVISION
.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Movie Review - 2012

Genre: Action
Director: Roland Emmerich
Starring: John Cusack, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Amanda Peet, Oliver Platt, Thomas MacCarthy, Zlatko Buric, Thandie Newton, Danny Glover, Woody Harrelson
Running Time: 158 minutes (plus trailers)

"When they tell you not to panic... that's when you run!"

An unkind person might accuse director Rolland Emmerich of making the same film over and over again. It’s certainly true that movies like Independence Day, Godzilla, and now 2012 have a lot in common, be it in the destruction of world landmarks, the heavy reliance on CGI or the repeated use of some variation of the line “oh my god…that’s impossible”. There is little doubt that Emmerich is one of those filmmakers who has found his niche and stuck to it, and one should never expect to see anything new or groundbreaking in his movies unless of course it is the latest and greatest in computer generated devastation. However, it’s probably unfair to say that 2012 is just another Roland Emmerich movie; if anything, it is the Roland Emmerich movie to end all Roland Emmerich movies, featuring such absurd levels of destruction that we can only wonder where he will go and what he will destroy from here.

2012, for those of you who haven’t seen the trailers, is about the end of the world. More specifically, the end of the world as it was prophesized by the Mayan calendar, scheduled to take place on December 21st of the titular year. Chiwitel Ejiofor, in rough correspondence to the character Jeff Goldblum played in Independence Day, or the character Dennis Quaid played in The Day After Tomorrow (another Emmerich gem) plays the scientist who discovers the phenomenon. With only a short time to prepare for the coming apocalypse, the world’s governments put into action a plan to ensure that the human race and much of its culture survives, even if the planet does not. John Cusack plays a novelist turned limo driver and father of two, generally dissatisfied with his life now that his wife has left him and his career is going nowhere (two parts Will Smith in Independence Day, two parts Matthew Broderick in Godzilla).

Once the ground literally starts crumbling underneath them, a newly invigorated Cusack (turns out the end of the world was all he needed to get him motivated) swears to protect his family at all costs. And, with the help of a series of completely unbelievable coincidences, be they in the form of his business relationship with a Russian billionaire, the fact that his wife’s new boyfriend knows how to pilot a plane (something that comes in handy on no less than three separate occasions), or a chance encounter with a kooky conspiracy theorist played by Woody Harrelson (shades of Randy Quaid in Independence Day…just saying) he might just be able to succeed. Of course, I’m not going to tell you whether they make it or not; I wouldn’t want to spoil the ending.

If you paid to see 2012 then there is absolutely no reason why you should be dissatisfied with what you saw. Because if ever there was one, this is a movie that delivers exactly what it promises. Shit. Gets. Fucked. Up. Alongside Michael Bay (Transformers, Bad Boys), Emmerich is the undisputed master of carefully choreographed CGI mayhem, and the special effects here truly are jaw-dropping. The action isn’t all that exciting because you already know which characters are going to live and which are going to die (hint: the adorable children are going to be okay), but it never the less holds your interest; it’s not about tension but about spectacle, and I would cite the Yellowstone eruption in this movie as one of the most awe inspiring disaster sequences I have ever seen.

Perhaps somewhat unfortunately, the movie isn’t just scene after scene of things blowing up and unnamed civilians perishing in their millions. Sadly, as I’ve already made clear, the characters themselves aren’t exactly original. Likewise, the dialogue and the story itself was passable but hardly inspired. But on the plus side the acting is generally of a very high caliber; John Cusack is solid as always, Woody Harrelson is entertainingly nuts, Oliver Platt is believable as the pragmatic government official and Chiwetel Ejiofor has genuine charisma as the noble scientist; the poor man should really consider taking on a more pronounceable screen name, as he certainly deserves to be more famous than he currently is.

And while the movie never really does anything spectacular with its story, I did like how no one is really painted as a direct villain in 2012. Characters like the Chief of Staff or Yuri, while selfish and sometimes unkind, are not fundamentally bad people. I liked how those characters, who in other films might simply to confined to the role of personality lacking antagonist, are shown to be human here, albeit very briefly. It’s interesting that the “bad guys” in Emmerich films are rarely people; it’s always nature or some other outside power that forces humanity to come together as one. It’s cheesy, but it’s also kind of nice to think about the sort of oddly unifying power of annihilation; the president being made to wait by a paramedic, the wealthy people who buy their safe passage, only to point out that if you had the money to save your family, wouldn’t you?

Of course any profundity that might have been trying to poke through the surface here is quickly lost by the time we reach the next scene of a plane trying to take off as the runway collapses behind it. And that is essentially what this movie boils down to: fleeing and collapsing. As that, it totally works, although admittedly it works for far too long. At over two and a half hours, 2012 needed some serious time on the editing floor, especially with so many scenes, subplots and even whole characters (cough*presidents daughter*cough) ripe for removal. The movie, for all its likeable actors and impressive visuals, was not engaging or original enough to sustain my interest for the entire runtime and by the time the end credits rolled I was certainly ready to make my way out.

With 2012 Emmerich has done what he always does; create a flashy, entertaining, somewhat exciting but ultimately pretty forgettable film about a bunch of shit that explodes in very high resolution. So if that’s what you want to watch then go right ahead, you’re definitely going to get your money’s worth. The best part of the movie for me was probably seeing the Avatar trailer that played before hand – not high praise I know. But ultimately I did like this movie well enough, and yes I’ll probably go and see whatever disaster porn the man puts together next. I can’t imagine what he has left to blow up though...do you think destroying the Australian Houses of Parliament would have the same resonance as the White House? Probably not.



2012 is in cinemas now; see it before Roland Emmerich blows them all up.

P.S. The following trailer is not the official one, but I feel that it gives a far better representation of what the movie is actually like. Plus every time I was it I laugh hysterically. Enjoy!



Large Association of Movie Blogs

One of the best Australian films of the year on ABC1

Samson & Delilah, the critically acclaimed award winning drama from first time Australian filmmaker Warwick Thornton will be airing tonight at 8:30 on ABC1 (Australia). Anyone who has the chance to check it out absolutely should do so as it is one of the best films of 2009 Australian or otherwise. Also airing the following Thursday at 9:30 will be a behind the scenes look at the making of the film, which should also prove to be interesting.

Samson & Delilah is a bleak and hard hitting drama about two Aboriginal teenagers struggling to overcome addiction and the dire conditions of their rural outback settlement. Thornton's unflinching depiction of the racial problems in this country sometimes make the movie very difficult to watch. But it is a masterfully made film with a powerful and important story, and I thought it was definitely worth drawing attention to. You can check out my full review of the film here.


Awesome Scene Sunday: "Can we lock up and get drunk now?"

How time does fly.

The last time I did a selection for awesome scene sunday I was a stressed out high school student staring down the barrel of my final exam. And this was probably reflected somewhat in my rather morbind pick for that sunday, a creepy monologue from the movie Se7en (fun times, am I right?)

But now, I am a free man with more than three months to watch movies, hang out with my friends and just relax. With that in mind, todays scene is rather more celebratory than previous entries; I don't feel the need do give much set up, other than to say that it comes from Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, Guy Ritchies first and best film (Snatch = overrated). This is one of my favourite movies. It is the epitome of stylish 90's film making,. And if this scene is a reflection of what my Christmas break will be like, I could do a lot worse.

Bottoms up :)


Saturday, November 21, 2009

People tell me I should watch this show...Doctor Who I mean



Andrew Hansen always was the best thing about The Chaser anyway.

Friday, November 20, 2009

Movie Review - New Moon

.
A word from the editor:

Ah Twilight! Is there any current film franchise that is quite so divisive? From the obsessive fangirls to the indignant fanboys, everyone I know has something to say about this series, be it "fuck that shit" or "OMG I am so team [insert name of ridiculously muscular yet understanding guy with some form of supernatural power here]". I myself have made my views clear in an article I wrote some months back; my conclusion was essentially that, I like seeing girls take their clothes off, so I can't really begrudge girls drooling over Edward Sparkelypants, now can I?

uh...sorry...what was I saying? Got a bit distracted there...

That being said, while I no longer harbour any ill feeling towards this series, the idea of going to see New Moon, the second film in the Twilight saga (and FYI, just because you call it a saga does not make it a saga) did absolutely nothing for me. Luckily (at least from my perspective), my good friend H. Winslow was willing to take another one for the team, watching and reviewing another movie I had no interest in seeing (click here for his previous review of The Taking of Pelham 123) so that you, my readers, would be able to decide whether it was worth your time.

That being said, if you need a review to tell you whether you should go and see this movie, then you really aren't the target audience for it in the first place.

Genre: Vampire Romance
Director: Chris Weitz
Starring: Kristen Stewart, Robert Pattinson, Taylor Lautner
Running Time: 130 minutes (plus trailers)

"You're my only reason to stay... alive - if that's what I am"

It's hard to miss the vampire-mania that's been sweeping the world the past year or so, and it's not just the 12-30 females lapping it up. Sure, there's the Twilight “saga”, Vampire Academy and The Vampire Diaries to appeal to the prepubescent masses but there's also programming to appeal to the adult crowd, including the gritty HBO series True Blood and last year’s sleeper hit from Sweden Let The Right One In (the English language remake is currently in production). Unsurprisingly however, New Moon, the newest addition to the series that started it all, definitely falls into the first camp – not that anyone should be surprised. Anyone with a taste for fantasy will probably be able to find something to enjoy here; then again, while not a bad film per-se, I doubt many outside the dedicated fan girls will really fall in love with this.

Since the last film, vampire Edward Cullen (Pattinson) and human Bella Swan (Kirsten Stewart) have continued their relationship. However, Bella is worried about the fact that she'll continue to age while her undead lover will retain the physical appearance of an 18 year-old for eternity, and is insistent that he change her into a vampire so they can continue their love without the awkward age difference. Matters are complicated a little when the Cullen family must move away, as their immortality catches up with them once again. This not only leaves Bella heartbroken, but also puts her in grave danger, as Victoria (Rachelle Lefevre) – whose boyfriend Edward killed at the end of the first movie wants revenge. Thankfully, Bella's wannabe lover Jacob (Taylor Lautner) and the rest of his mostly shirtless clan turn out to be werewolves.

Let's start with the good points of this film. I haven't read any of the books, but from what I've heard, Stephanie Meyer (the original author) is no Shakespeare, and that shows in the story and dialogue of the film. The plot is predictable and the dialogue is far from the wittiest modern cinema has to often, but the fantastic love story (fantastic in this sense meaning "with fantasy") set on the picturesque backdrop of Forks makes for an interesting story – even if it isn't told in the best possible way. What I also liked about both the last film and this one, is how “realistic” a vampire story like this actually is. Except for the sudden trip to Italy in the film's climax, the world that Meyer has created is an intriguing and believable one despite being inhabited by various mythical creatures.

Most of the acting is bearable; I particularly enjoyed Ashley Greene's performance as Alice Cullen, Edward's sister and Bella's best friend. The cinematography, too, while rarely venturing away from gloomy, does a good job of encapsulating the mood of the film, and it really exemplifies the beauty of the setting. The biggest problem with this film would have to be Robert Pattinson's portrayal of Edward Cullen. I don't know whether it's bad decisions by director Chris Weitz, poor dialogue, or just because he's a crappy actor, but his performance is just atrocious. What's worse is that because most of his dialogue is slow and monotonous, he seems to drain the acting ability of anyone on-screen at the same time as him. The scene in which Edward reveals to Bella that he must leave Forks was tear-jerking for all the wrong reasons. Pattinson's lack of any emotion in his performance makes Keanu Reeves look versatile by comparison.

It's some solace that Edward was absent for most of the film, as the near-romance between Bella and Jacob was a lot more palatable. Honestly, I doubt this film will appeal to anyone who reads this blog, but the romantic drama that New Moon dishes out will certainly appease the target demographic...at least until the next movie



New Moon is in cinemas now



Large Association of Movie Blogs

Thursday, November 19, 2009

LAMBcast Episode #5 - "George Clooney has nipples"

In the latest episode of the LAMBcast, the official podcast of The Large Association of Movie Blogs, the feature topic of discussion was none other than the supposed "last great movie star," Mr. George Clooney. Clooney has three films currently in theatres in the US; Up in the Air, The Men Who Stare at Goats and his vocal performance in Fantastic Mr. Fox (as always, we Australians will just have to be patient). But even though I am geographically challenged, it still seemed like a good opportunity to dissect the man's career, from The Facts of Life to Batman & Robin and everything in between. Also on tap: some Trailer Talk and a game of Last Man Person Standing.

You can listen to the LAMBcast via the widget in the sidebar, or you can subscribe in iTunes: just search for "lambcast".

In this episode, I was joined by fellow LAMBs:

* Dylan Fields of Blog Cabins
* Nick Jobe of Random Ramblings of a Demented Doorknob,
* Mike Mendez of Big Mike's Movie Blog, and
* Alex Kittle of Film Forager.

You can find all the trailers discussed in this episode over on the LAMB site.

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Poll question: What TV show should I watch next? Also, results of a now redundant poll!

If there's one thing us bloggers seem to love, it's polls. I think the reason for this is because they make us feel loved; even if someone just accidentally stumbles across our blog on their way to pornography, the levels of effort required to participate in a poll are so minuscule that odds are they'll click on one of the options anyway. Thus we can convince ourselves that more people read our sites than is actually the case.

For example, in a poll about two weeks ago, I asked you what movie I should watch after finishing my exams; the results where as follows



So it looks like The Coen Brother's come out on top with A Serious Man. Unfortunately, this poll was predicated on the idea that I was a diligent student and would be able to hold off on going to the movies for over two weeks. However this is not the case, and I ended up going to see a total of three movies over my exam period: The Box, The Brothers Bloom as well as An Education. I really enjoyed all three, but this could have been coloured somewhat by the fact that anything beats studying for chemistry.

Anyway, thanks for the advice everyone one, even though I basically ignored it. I should say that while the initial purpose of the poll was lost, I still fully plan on seeing A Serious Man (as well as probably all the other films listed as options) once I do in fact finish my exams (in 24 hours and 12 minutes).

And as I said, all bloggers love polls. So even though the previous one turned out to be pretty much a total waste of time, I'm gonna try another one. While my movie viewing has been pretty healthy during my exams, my television habit has suffered severely. I'm a big TV on DVD person, but I currently have over half a dozen box sets sitting on my shelf that I am yet to touch.

So, once again, I've decided to let you decide which one I crack into first once my exams and an extensive period of celebration (read: drinking) have passed. And this time, I promise to actually follow your advice.

Here are your options:

Awesome Scene Sunday: "Innocent people"

Today's scene comes from one of my favourite serial killer movies, and the film that put director David Fincher (Fight Club, Zodiac) on the map (let's just forget about Alien 3). The movie I am talking about is of course Se7en, a dark and violent picture about two cops (played by Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman) trying to track down a murderer who kills his victims according to the seven deadly sins. Check the scene below in which "John Doe" (played brilliantly by Kevin Spacey) taunts the two detectives. All three performances are excellent, and Spacey's monologue can send chills down my spine.

WARNING: SPOILERS LIE AHEAD!



Now this is basically your standard "killers taunts the police" scene, but of all the scenes of that mould out there (and yes there are an awful lot), I think that this is one of the most believable. John Doe is like a slightly more fallible, less sophistocated version of Hannibal Lector. Sure he's clever, but also clearly human. And that really is the best thing about Se7en; it takes very old and familiar tropes: the obsessive killer, the young angry cop parterned with the world weary one (only a week away from retirement no less!) and manages to bring them new life.

Got any thoughts on Se7en? Leave them below!

You can check out previous A.S.S selections here.

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Movie Review - The Brothers Bloom

Genre: Heist, Comedy, Drama
Director: Rian Johnson
Starring: Adrien Brody, Mark Ruffalo, Rachel Weisz, Rinko Kikuchi, Robbie Coltrane
Running Time: 113 minutes (plus trailers)

“The perfect con is one where everyone involved gets just what they wanted”

In the delightful opening scene of The Brothers Bloom, the narrator (who sounds suspiciously similar to the narrator of P.T. Anderson’s Magnolia) introduces us to the titular brothers, the charismatic heroes of director Rian Johnson’s follow up to the critically acclaimed indie noir thriller Brick. Siblings and partners in crime, from a young age there was nothing the Brothers Bloom did better than pull elaborate and highly entertaining cons; Steven (played by Mark Ruffalo) is the master planner, spinning complex webs of deception with incredible ease and exuberant humour. The younger brother, addressed only by his surname (and played by Adrien Brody) is the roper and for all of the thirty five years of his life he has played the parts that Steven has written for him, helping make the Brothers Bloom famous all around the world, from St Petersburg to Prague.

Bloom however has begun to grow weary of the life and decides to leave the game for good, settling down in Montenegro for an extensive sabbatical. But of course Steven will have none of that, and so he draws Bloom back in for (wait for it) one final con. The mark: Penelope Stamp (Rachel Weisz), a wealthy but isolated heiress just waiting (as Steven puts it) for someone to sweep her off her feet. The plan seems to be going smoothly; the trap is set and the bait is caught, there’s only one little hitch: Bloom begins to fall in love (I know, what a shocker). The Brothers Bloom is a piece of pure light entertainment, filled with sweet, quirky and funny dialogue and characters, and a story that, at least until the rather weak third act, is an absolute joy to watch unfold.

The first hour of this film would probably be up there as one of the most enjoyable hours I’ve had at the cinema all year. There is such a fresh, breezy style to everything about this movie, from the dialogue to the direction to incredible costume and production design. There is always something cool to watch on screen, be it yellow Lamborghini or a well placed wall mural, and it’s always matched by stylish editing and direction from behind the camera. On top of that, Johnson has crafted some of the most fun and likeable characters you’ll ever see. From the naïve but enthusiastic Penelope to the charming but crafty Steven to the melancholy but kindhearted Bloom and of course the sardonically silent demolitions expert Bang Bang (played with a wonderful dry wit by Rinko Kikuchi), I defy anyone not to fall in love with at least one of the main protagonists, if not all four.

As the film reaches its conclusion is takes on a more serious tone that doesn’t really fit. Johnson seems to want to make the film into a classic con movie, and so the story gets darker and more complex, and the enjoyment factor suffers as a result. Unfortunately, the actual con the brothers are pulling at the end of the film isn’t all that interesting, Blooms motivations aren’t particularly clear (or logical), and the final climax in which you are unsure what is going on; whether the brothers are really in danger or if the whole thing is just another one of Steven’s elaborate ruses, doesn’t work nearly as well in execution as it probably did on paper.

At the end of the day, as a conman movie, The Brothers Bloom it isn’t particularly strong. Like many far better entries into the genre, there are moments when the audience themselves are being tricked, but here the reveals just aren’t satisfying. But while the film doesn't really work as a drama, where it absolutely succeeds, thanks in combination to Johnson and the actors, is as a breezy, lighthearted caper film. Apart from the last half hour, this movie is just non-stop fun; exotic locales, amazing designs and a wonderfully quirky cast of characters, all of whom are portrayed by actors who are clearly having a blast. This is three quarters of a fantastic movie, and even the weak ending (which to be honest isn’t even that weak) cannot make you forget how much you enjoyed hanging out with Bang Bang, Penelope and The Brothers Bloom.





The Brothers Bloom is now showing in Australia in limited release. It is currently available in the US on DVD

Large Association of Movie Blogs

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Giant battle on a hostile alien planet...y'know, for kids. New trailer for "The Little Avatar"

"Gee willikers mommy! Do you think after the funny blue man is finished in the magical rainbow forest he'll have time to go swimming in the chocolate river where all his dreams come true?"

"Oh I'm sure he will Timmy. I'm sure he will."

So I was watching the latest trailer for James Cameron's Avatar and um...what the fuck?!



Honestly, if it wasn't for the epic trailer from last week that promised insane amounts of violence with missiles and monsters and all that awesome stuff, this trailer might have very well put me off going to see this film. I just pray that this is simply a whorish attempt on behalf of the studio to trick parents into letting their kids see what will hopefully still be a very action oriented film, and not an accurate reflection of what the movie is really like. I honestly thought I was watching the trailer for a Disney movie or something.

Anyway, just a quick note to you all you marketers out there; the following phrases should not be allowed to be used in reference to the newest film from the guy who made Terminator, Terminator 2 and Aliens:

"a place beyond your imagination"
"where wonder lives and adventure rules"
"experience the wonder"
"greatest adventure of all time"

Seriously people, it's Pandora, not Hogwarts. Show some god damn respect.

Avatar will be in theatres worldwide from December 17th. Take the whole family.